The Importance of Biblical Realism

a guest post by Ryan Hedrich

(More from Ryan Hedrich may be found at Unapologetica).

Background

In Justification, J. V. Fesko wrote:

In the theology of Aquinas, and those committed to realism, the idea that universals have an existence separate from specific concrete entities, which drew upon the philosophy of Plato (c. 427-.c 348 B.C.) and is also known as the via antiqua (the “old way”), there was a greater emphasis upon seeing justification strictly in ontological terms. With the turn from ontology to discussions on the will of God in the theology of those committed to nominalism, the idea that universals do not have real existence but are merely names applied to qualities found within certain individual objects and that is also known as the via moderna (the “modern way”), for example, in the theology of Biel and William of Ockham (c. 1288 – c. 1348), we see the development of the intellectual framework in which the doctrine of justification could be considered in something other than in terms of ontology. In other words, it seems that nominalism opened the door to a consideration of the forensic nature of justification, and more specifically, the doctrine of imputation. This development, combined with the renaissance of Augustinianism in the fourteenth century, such as in the theology of Thomas Bradwardine (c. 1290 – 1349) and Gregory of Rimini (c. 1300 – 58), contributed to the intellectual development that made the Reformation possible.

McGrath notes six things that one finds in late medieval Augustinian theology that likely contributed to the theology of the Reformation:

  1. A strict epistemological nominalism.
  2. A voluntarist, as opposed to intellectualist, understanding of the ratio meriti (“reckoning of merit”). Voluntarism emphasizes the role of the will contrasted with that of reason or intellect.
  3. The extensive use of the writings of Augustine, particularly his anti-Pelagian works.
  4. A strongly pessimistic view of original sin, with the fall being identified as a watershed in the economy of salvation.
  5. A strong emphasis upon the priority of God in justification, linked to a doctrine of special grace.
  6. A radical doctrine of absolute double predestination.

With these intellectual developments in mind, we can move forward to consider the doctrine of justification in the Reformation and post-Reformation periods. It is against this backdrop that one sees the Reformation begin to give a more precise expression and definition of the doctrine of justification.

Continue reading “The Importance of Biblical Realism”

Osiander’s Error & Realism’s Truth

by Ken Hamrick

Andreas Osiander
Andreas Osiander

A consistently realistic system of theology is one in which a parallel is found between our realistic union with Adam and our realistic union with Christ–the former being the ground of justice for our suffering the consequences of Adam’s sin, and the latter being the ground of justice for our being justified and saved by the life, death and resurrection of Christ. That is the position I have sought to put forward as the best understanding of Scripture.[1]

One criticism of the consistent realistic system, which occasionally arises and must be addressed, is that such a system is a rehash of the sixteenth-century error of Andreas Osiander that was universally rejected by the Church. Timothy Wengert has written a very detailed book, entitled, Defending Faith,[2] about the “reactions to and condemnations of [Osiander’s thought by] …Evangelical theologians of all sorts throughout the Holy Roman Empire… for the better part of the 1550’s.”[3]

Continue reading “Osiander’s Error & Realism’s Truth”

Origin of the Soul: A Defense of Paternal Traducianism

Also posted at SBC Open Forum.

By Ken Hamrick

Was your soul newly created for you by God, or was it passed down to you from the previous generations, much like your DNA was, and originally came from Adam? This may seem an obscure question, but it is actually foundational to most of theology. Whether or not you have ever considered the question before, the theology that you hold has built much of its doctrinal understanding upon an assumed answer to this question—and most have assumed that the soul is newly created by God in every case. The paper that follows is an excerpt of the current draft of a much larger work in progress, entitled, Mechanics of Atonement: Restoring Reality to Imputation. There is heavy emphasis on Turretin, since I have not found a more thorough argument than his. [Note: Although early theologians, such as Turretin, refer to the “soul,” it is in a dichotomistic way that is interchangeable with “spirit.” Early tradition used the term, “soul,” almost exclusively to refer to the immaterial component of a man, reserving the term, “spirit,” for the Holy Spirit. Perhaps this was to avoid confusion between the Holy Spirit and the human spirit. The Bible does use “spirit” as well as “soul” when referring to man’s immaterial component or nature (the inner man as opposed to the outer man). Both words are used interchangeably throughout this paper, except where otherwise specified.]

[20,000 words] The spirit is what make us most like God, and makes us everlasting beings. Continue reading “Origin of the Soul: A Defense of Paternal Traducianism”